jose sued an auto manufacturer exclusively for strict product liability when a defect in his purchased automobile's electrical lines caused a fire, leading to a total loss of the vehicle. jose did not suffer any personal injuries as a result of the incident. the auto manufacturer defended the claim of strict product liability on the basis that there were no personal injuries and the defect in the product only resulted in economic loss to jose. how does jose's claim stand up to the manufacturer's defense? a.) jose is likely to lose, because economic loss relating only to the product itself, as opposed to personal injuries, is not typically recoverable under strict product liability. b.) jose is likely to win, because economic loss is recoverable under strict product liability if a product is defective. c.) jose is likely to lose, unless he can provide a reasonable alternative design to the product that would have prevented the fire. d.) jose is likely to win, because there is no indication that he was aware of the defect in the automobile's electrical lines and elected to drive it anyway.