Suppose a mutual fund qualifies as having moderate risk if the standard deviation of its monthly rate of return is less than 3%. A mutual-fund rating agency randomly selects 27 months and determines the rate of return for a certain fund. The standard deviation of the rate of return is computed to be 2.55 %. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the fund has moderate risk at the a= 0.05 level of significance? A normal probability plot indicates that the monthly rates of return are normally distributed. What are the correct hypotheses for this test?