Carlos has been sued for the tort of negligence while working at SKS Logistics. He failed to inspect his truck and missed seeing a failure in the brake line that caused him to get in an accident. Which of the following is true?

a. SKS is not vicariously liable if they have liability insurance.
b. The plaintiff can only sue SKS if they specifically told Carlos not to check the brakes.
c. Carlos cannot be sued because he was on the job; SKS bears all the risk.
d. The plaintiff should sue both Carlos and SKS under the doctrine of vicarious liability.
e. Carlos should be sued for the tort of deceit for lying about having working brakes.