The owner of land executed an instrument that purported to convey the land to a transferee. The instrument, which contained all the necessary elements of a deed, contained the following statement, "This transfer is made for the sum of $1.00 and other good and valuable consideration." The transferee promptly and properly recorded the instrument. Subsequently, the owner challenged the validity of the deed based on lack of consideration. The owner can prove that he did not receive any cash or other consideration from the transferee.

Should the deed be set aside?

A. No, because consideration is not required to effect a transfer of land.
B. No, because the instrument has been recorded.
C. Yes, because parol evidence may be introduced to contradict the recitation in the deed of the receipt of consideration.
D. Yes, because the act of recording does not validate an otherwise void deed.