A plaintiff sued a defendant in federal court under diversity jurisdiction to rescind a contract due to fraud. The contract involved the plaintiff's purchase of the defendant's helicopter. Prior to the purchase, the defendant, at the plaintiff's request, provided the plaintiff with maintenance records for the helicopter, which the plaintiff now believes were false. In the complaint, the plaintiff alleged that on a specific day and at a specific time the defendant "fraudulently induced plaintiff to enter into a contract to purchase a helicopter." The defendant has timely moved for a more definite statement of the claim. Should the court grant the defendant's motion?
A) No, because the complaint contains a short and plain statement of the claim.
B) No, because the complaint provides the defendant with notice of the claim.
C) Yes, because the complaint must show that there is a probability that the plaintiff is entitled to relief.
D) Yes, because the circumstances constituting fraud must be pled with particularity.