Sally Seller has an upscale clothing store on Rodeo Drive in Beverly Hills. She puts an advertisement in the LA Times that she is selling skinny jeans for $175, a bargain for this particular designer. Betty Buyer, a fashionista on a budget, was ecstatic to hear about the sale and went to the store that very same afternoon, as soon as she got off work. Betty pulled $175 cash from her purse and said, "I'll take the skinny jeans in a size 4, please." Sally had already sold out of Betty's size. She explained the situation to Betty, who was furious. Betty became even angrier when Sally refused to give Betty a "rain check," allowing Betty to purchase the jeans at the same price when her size came in. Betty sued Sally for breach of contract. In the suit against Sally Seller, Betty will likely:
(A) Prevail, because Sally made a viable offer that Betty accepted by showing up at the store, with cash, to purchase the jeans in response to the ad and on the same day the ad ran in the paper.
(B) Prevail, because while Sally was not in breach for running out of Betty's size, she was in breach for failing to give her a "rain check."
(C) Lose, because Sally has not made a valid offer.
(D) Lose, because Betty did not effectively tender performance.