Read the following scenario.

In a workplace meeting, the topic under discussion is a recently missed deadline and how deadlines can be met in the future.

Which of the following would be a violation of the guidelines for successful interaction?

a) looking for common ground among everyone’s observations

b) listening as each person explains his or her point of view

c) pointing out that a specific co-worker works more slowly than everyone else

d) carefully phrasing your ideas so as not to sound defensive

Expressing that time might have been met on the off chance that Paul had not committed so many errors would be an infringement of the rules for effective collaboration.

What was Paul's point of view about deadlines?

Watching individuals' non-verbal communication can be extremely useful to cooperation on the grounds that is an expansion of what the individual feels and thinks.

Listening cautiously is an awesome instrument, it can assist with getting arrangements.

Calling attention to similitudes other than aiding track down the arrangement, energizes cooperation.

Expressing that the time hadn't been met in view of Paul is terrible communication since you are straightforwardly faulting on an individual as opposed to searching for arrangements collectively.

For more information about deadline, refer the following link:

https://brainly.com/question/15300486

#SPJ2