Respuesta :
What structural linguists do not take is:
Grammer content sets a pattern of common to a given
Further Explanation
Structure in language, the term structure is related to language as a system. The structural approach to language implies an approach that considers language as a system with certain characteristics, the use of the word "structure" in structuralism is accompanied by all the contexts that have been described, namely significant-signifies, parole-langue, the synchronous irony.
1. Significant and significant
This distinction is at the heart of Saussure's view of the sign. In popular opinion, a sign of language shows objects in reality.
2. Langage, parole, and Langue
So that linguistic objects can be determined further, if the language phenomenon is generally indicated by the term language, then the language must be distinguished between parole and langue. By the word parole, it is intended to use individual languages. If we look for translations in English, speech or language use can be submitted. But parole is not studied by linguistics.
3. Synchrony and diachrony
Diachrony is a historical observation while synchrony shows a view that is not separated from the historical perspective, synchrony is a historical observation.
Learn more
language structure https://brainly.com/question/2863625, https://brainly.com/question/1564754
Details
Class: High School
Subject: English
Keywords: language structure
Answer:
Grammatical structure offers influence to words, given the context.
Explanation:
The position of the structural linguists can be summarized in the following principles:
1. Grammar constitutes a set of patterns common to a given community.
2. Each language or dialect has its own patterns.
3. Analysis and description of a language must conform to scientific theory in simplicity, in consistency, in completeness, and in adaptability to change.
Examples of what structural linguists do:
- Claimed that great gaps existed between traditional grammatical rules and English as it is actually spoken.
- They attempted to expose three types of fallacies in traditionalists' thinking
- Structural linguists assume that the grammar of a language consists of the linguistic facts of that language and little else.
- Consequently, a structuralist does not label particular usages as "correct" or "incorrect." For example, structural linguists would consider sentences such as "I didn't do nothing" and "I ain't got none" as fully functional and legitimate English sentences on the basis that they are used, understood, and accepted in a number of communities, even though such sentences are not standard English grammar
Hence, leaving out one option which is the answer above.