What’s is the missing justification in the proof ?

Answer:
By definition of supplementary angles
Step-by-step explanation:
We have to prove that
[tex]\angle 1=\angle 3[/tex]
We have to find missing justification in the given proof.
Proof:
Segment CD intersect segment AB
Reason: Given
[tex]\angle 1+\angle 2=180^{\circ}[/tex]
[tex]\angle 2+\angle 3=180^{\circ}[/tex]
Reason: By definition of supplementary angles
[tex]\angle 1+\angle 2=\angle 2+\angle 3[/tex]
Reason: Transitive property
[tex]\angle 1=\angle 3[/tex]
Reason: subtraction property of equality