Respuesta :

Answer:

So a translation and a rotation and that is it.

D.

Step-by-step explanation:

There is no reflection.

If we had a negative in front of the x there would have been a reflection.

We can definitely tell the graph was translated 3 units up because of the +3.

There are other ways to look at a translation of a line but it has been translated for sure.

It has also been rotated because of the factor of 1/9 in front of x.

Let me show you a graph.

Comparing to y=mx+b where m is slope and b is y-intercept, we see the slope of f(x)=x is 1 and the y-intercept of f(x)=x is 0 while

the slope of g(x)=(1/9)x+3 is (1/9) and y-intercept of g(x)=(1/9)x+3 is 3.

I drew them here on the graph.

I also drew y=x+3 which has slope 1 and y-intercept 3.

So I just wanted to show you have we translate y=x up to y=x+3, you still don't have the same line.  But notice if you rotate y=x+3 using the (0,3) as the center of rotation you could get the green line to lay on the orange line.

Ver imagen freckledspots
DeanR

Is this supposed to be multiple choice? If so it's a terrible question as the answer is all of the above. I'll sketch out the transformations, avoiding details.

Transform y=x to y=x/9 + 3

a. using rotation and reflection

Rotate around the origin to get y=-x/9 and reflect in y=3/2 to get y=x/9 +3

b. using translation, reflection, rotation

Translate to y = x - 3, reflect in the x axis to get y = x + 3 and rotate around (0,3) to get the result.

c. using translation and reflection.

Translate to y = x + 3 and reflect along the line which bisects the angle at (0,3).

d. rotation and translation

Rotate to a slope of 1/9 and translate up 3 units.