Respuesta :
Answer:
C. Access to an attorney
Explanation:
In 1961 Gideon v. Wainwright was arrested because of stealing money from vending machines in Florida. During his trial, Wainwright requested that an attorney was appointed to represent him since he could not afford one himself; however, the reply he got was that Florida only provided attorneys to indigent defendants who in case they were guilty might face death penalty.
By 1963 the Supreme Court ruled that the constitution requires the states to provide attorneys to those who can not afford lawyers themselves.
c. Access to an attorney
Further explanation
The court refused to appoint legal counsel for Gideon. As a result, he was forced to act as his own advisor and make his own defense in court, stressing his innocence within the case. At the tip of the trial, the jury returns the guilty verdict. The court sentenced Gideon to serve a five-year sentence in prison house.
Gideon v. Wainwright was one among a series of Supreme Court decisions that affirmed the defendant's right in criminal proceedings, at his request, to own a counselor appointed both during the trial and through an appeal. within the cases of Massiah v. future us, 377 US 201 (1964) and Miranda v. Arizona 384 US 436 (1966), the Supreme Court further expanded the principles to be applied even during police questioning.
in step with Florida state law, however, an attorney may only be appointed to a private defendant in capital cases, that the tribunal failed to appoint one. Gideon represented himself within the trial. He was found guilty and sentenced to 5 years in prison. Gideon filed a habeas corpus petition within the Florida Supreme Court, arguing that the trial court's decision violated his constitutional right to be represented by counsel. The Florida Supreme Court denied habeas corpus relief.
Learn More
Gideon v. Wainwright https://brainly.com/question/13590387
The case https://brainly.com/question/13590387
Details
Class: College
Subject: History
Keywords: Gideon, court, Florida
