Answer:
Option 2 is the right answer
Explanation:
When government obtains any evidence though a conduct deemed unconstitutional (unlawful search or seizure), such evidence would be suppressed by the court. When the defendant is brought to court for eventual trial, such evidence would be inadmissible. U.S courts have used this rule in several occasions, to prevent police officers and agents of the government from abusing constitutional rights of the people.
The exclusionary rule says that when a defendant is brought before a court to be tried, any evidence collected in an unreasonable way is considered to be illegal cannot be admitted into consideration.
In the United States, the exclusionary rules, based on constitutional law, prohibit evidence collected or analyzed in violation of a defendant's constitutional rights from being used in a court of law.
When the government finds any evidence even though the conduct appears to be unconstitutional (illegal search or seizure), such evidence may be suppressed by a court.
U.S. courts have repeatedly used the law to prevent police and government agents from abusing the defendant's constitutional rights. It is based on exclusionary rules adopted by the court of law in the United States.
Thus, Option B. is the correct statement.
To learn more about exclusionary rules, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/1916493
