Answer:
Option B) Fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Population mean, μ = $6,000
Sample mean, [tex]\bar{x}[/tex] = $6,300
Sample size, n = 49
Alpha, α = 0.01
Population standard deviation, σ = $1,000
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
[tex]H_{0}: \mu = 6000\text{ dollars per week}\\H_A: \mu > 6000\text{ dollars per week}[/tex]
We use one-tailed(right) z test to perform this hypothesis.
Formula:
[tex]z_{stat} = \displaystyle\frac{\bar{x} - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}} }[/tex]
Putting all the values, we have
[tex]z_{stat} = \displaystyle\frac{6300 - 6000}{\frac{1000}{\sqrt{49}} } = 2.1[/tex]
Now, [tex]z_{critical} \text{ at 0.01 level of significance } = 2.33[/tex]
Since,
[tex]z_{stat} < z_{critical}[/tex]
We fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis. Thus, we conclude that sales have not increased as a result of the advertising campaign
Option B) Fail to reject the null hypothesis.