Suppose you wanted to evaluate the performance of the three judges in Smallville, Texas: Judge Adams, Judge Brown, and Judge Carter. Over a three-year period in Smallville, Judge Adams saw 27% of the cases, Judge Brown saw 31% of the cases, and Judge Carter saw the remainder of the cases. 5% of Judge Adams' cases were appealed, 7% of Judge Brown's cases were appealed, and 9% of Judge Carter's cases were appealed. (See the case problem on pages 216-218 of your textbook for a similar problem.) Given a case from this three-year period was not appealed, what is the probability the judge in the case was not Judge Brown? Question 1 Of 46 bank accounts at a small bank, 25 accounts have values of less than $1,000 and the rest have values of at least $1,000. Suppose 4 accounts are randomly sampled (See exercise 9 on page 184 of your textbook for a similar problem.) What is the probability that exactly 3 of the 4 accounts have values of at least $1,000?

Question

22-02-2020
Mathematics

contestada

Suppose you wanted to evaluate the performance of the three judges in Smallville, Texas: Judge Adams, Judge Brown, and Judge Carter. Over a three-year period in Smallville, Judge Adams saw 27% of the cases, Judge Brown saw 31% of the cases, and Judge Carter saw the remainder of the cases. 5% of Judge Adams' cases were appealed, 7% of Judge Brown's cases were appealed, and 9% of Judge Carter's cases were appealed. (See the case problem on pages 216-218 of your textbook for a similar problem.) Given a case from this three-year period was not appealed, what is the probability the judge in the case was not Judge Brown? Question 1 Of 46 bank accounts at a small bank, 25 accounts have values of less than $1,000 and the rest have values of at least $1,000. Suppose 4 accounts are randomly sampled (See exercise 9 on page 184 of your textbook for a similar problem.) What is the probability that exactly 3 of the 4 accounts have values of at least $1,000?

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

Prepare a balance sheet in proper format for the company as of December 31st based on the following accounts. Answer questions 8 through 10 based on this balanc

The college professor was a real ............, a stern leader in the classroom- pedagogue - synagogue - demagogical - pedagogical - pedagogy

we the following percent word problems by setting up a proportion. Show work . A company spends $450,000 on print advertising. Of that amount, the advertis ecto

Enter the isotope symbol for an atom/ion that contains 55 protons, 77 neutrons, and 54 electrons.

Which of the following best describes the state of the market during the recovery phase of the real estate cycle?A Increases in hiring, employment, and public c

In which situation may you accept compensation for any personal teaching, speaking, or writing? a) When it is related to your profession or expertise. b) When i

Which Filipino composer touched the heart with their song? a) Jose Maceda b) Francisco Santiago c) Nicanor Abelardo d) Ryan Cayabyab

Length of rectangle=4a+3Breadth of rectangle=2a+1perimeter of rectangle=10a+12

Caleb paid $4.50 for 12 bagels. Which of the following have unit price for bagels greater than the unit price? a) $2.25 for 6 bagels b) $5.50 for 15 bagels c) $

Why are open-ended questions preferred for conducting patient interviews?

salwanadeem salwanadeem · Answer 1 · 2020-02-22T06:56:08+01:00

Answer:

Answer 1: Given that the case from this three-year period was not appealed, the probability that the judge was not Judge Brown is 0.689.

Answer 2: Probability that exactly 3 of the 4 accounts have values of at least $1000 is 0.2068.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer 1:

Probabilities that each of the judges saw the cases are:

P(Judge Adams) = 0.27

P(Judge Brown) = 0.31

P(Judge Carter) = 1 - (0.27+ 0.31)

P(Judge Carter) = 0.42

Probabilities that the cases of each of the judges were appealed(A) can be represented as a conditional probability:

P(A | Judge Adams) = 0.05

P(A | Judge Brown) = 0.07

P(A | Judge Carter) = 0.09

Hence we can find the probabilities that the cases of each of the judges were not appealed:

P(Not A | Judge Adams) = 1 - 0.05 = 0.95

P(Not A | Judge Brown) = 1 - 0.07 = 0.93

P(Not A | Judge Carter) = 1 - 0.09 = 0.91

We need to find the probability P(Judge Brown | Not A). For this we will use the Baye's Theorem:

P(Judge Brown | Not A) = [0.31*0.93]/[(0.27*0.95) + (0.31*0.93) + (0.42*0.91)]

= 0.2883/(0.2565 + 0.2883 + 0.3822)

= 0.2883/0.927

P(Judge Brown | Not A) = 0.311

P(Not Judge Brown | Not A) = 1 - 0.311 = 0.689

Given a case from this three-year period was not appealed, the probability the judge in the case was not Judge Brown is 0.689

Answer 2:

We will use the binomial distribution formula to find out the probability that exactly 3 of the 4 accounts have values of at least $1000. The binomial distribution formula is:

P(X=x) = ⁿCₓ pˣ qⁿ⁻ˣ

Where n = no. of trials

x = no. of successful trials

p = probability of success

q = probability of failure = 1-p

We have,

n = 46

x = 4

p = (46-25)/46 = 21/46

q = 25/46

P(X=3) = ⁴C₃ (21/46)³ (25/46)⁴⁻³

= 4 * (21/46)³ (25/46)¹

P(X=3) = 0.2068