A store has 5 years remaining on its lease in a mall. Rent is $1, 900 per month, 60 payments remain, and the next payment is due in 1 month. The mall's owner plans to sell the property in a year and wants rent at that time to be high so that the property will appear more valuable. Therefore, the store has been offered amiddot"great deal" (owner's words) on a new 5-year lease. The new lease calls for no rent for 9 months, then payments of $2, 700 per month for the next 51 months. The lease cannot be broken, and the store's WACC is 12% (or 1% per month)
a. Should the new lease be accepted? ____
b. If the store owner decided to bargain with the mall's owner over the new lease payment, what new lease payment would make the store owner indifferent between the new and the old leases? Round your answer to the nearest cent. Do not round your intermediate calculations. $ _____
c. The store owner is not sure of the 12% WACC - it could be higher or lower. At what nominal WACC would the store owner be indifferent between the two leases? Do not round your intermediate calculations. ____ %

Respuesta :

Answer:

a) No, since the present value of new lease is more than old.

b) Detailed information about the explanation is shown below

c) At 39.80%  nominal WACC

Explanation:

a

           PV of old and new lease terms

            Old              Cash Flow                New              Cash Flow

             0                  0                               0                    0                    

           1-9               - 1900                         1-9                   0                    

       10-60              - 1900                         10-60              2700

           NPER              60                          NPER                60

           rate                  1%                          rate                   1%

           PV             ($85,414.57)                PV                   ($98,250.36)

                            PV ( 1%, 60, 1900)                 PV ( 1%,9,- PV(1%,51, 2700))

Should the new lease be accepted? No, since the present value of new lease is more than old.

b)   If the store owner decided to bargain with the mall's owner over the new lease payment, what new lease payment would make the store owner indifferent between the new and the old leases?

For this part pv of old lease should be equal to pv of new lease at t = 9

                85414.57 × (1.01)⁹                             93416.657

                Nper                                                  51

                Rate                                                   1%

                New lease amount                           ( $2,347.26)

                                                                           PMT (1%, 51,93416.66)

c)

        Period      Old Lease       New Lease      Change in lease

          0                  0                    0                     0  

         1-9            -1900                 0                    -1900  

        10-60        -1900                  -2700             800

        -1900    

        -1900    

        -1900    

        -1900    

        -1900    

        -1900    

        -1900    

        -1900    

        -1900    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800  

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800

        3.317%                  x 12   =   39.80%

IRR(Values 1:60)

The store owner is not sure of the 12% WACC - it could be higher or lower. At what nominal WACC would the store owner be indifferent between the two leases?

At 39.80%  nominal WACC