Respuesta :

johntheking
Its important to do so because you never are completely sure on if the scientist is completely accurate and that they have done everything right, that is why every scientist retraces another scientists steps and completely redoes the experiment themselves. Your trying to make sure that your work and factual evidence is 100% accurate and wont be able to be proved wrong
jayilych4real

It is necessary to critique a scientific argument before it is accepted because:

  • It needs to be checked for authenticity
  • The details needs to be cross checked
  • It is important to redo the experiment in a controlled condition

A scientific argument is one that is made after testing a hypothesis and confirming that the facts are accurate and then publishing the findings.

As a result of this, if these processes are not done properly, then they  would be inaccurate information which would have misled the public

Read more here:

https://brainly.com/question/1223442

Otras preguntas