I assume you're asking the question, true or false?
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Comparative negligence lies on the legal theory that's one's negligence during an accident may hold that person partly responsible for injuries because he was partly responsible for the accident. There is the 51% rule in some states in the US whereby you can collect compensation if the motorcyclist(brenda here) is more than half at fault in the accident. Compensation to Adam is therefore reduced by the percentage of fault he has in the accident.
The statement is True: Comparative negligence lies in the legal theory that's one's negligence during an accident may hold that person partly chargeable for injuries because he was partly liable for the accident.
there's the 51% rule out some states within the US whereby you'll be able to collect compensation if the motorcyclist (Brenda here) is quite half guilty within the accident. Compensation to Adam is therefore reduced by the share of fault he has within the accident.
Find out more information about Comparative negligence in the US here:
https://brainly.com/question/13193817
