Answer:
Equity remedy: Injunction.
Explanation:
Given the case above, the team can sue Calvin for the remainder of his contract with them, which will make him not to be eligible for playing baseball.
The remedy the team could seek is EQUITY REMEDY, this is often applicable in a situations where there is a breach of contract, and monetary damages won’t be enough for the nonbreaching party.
There are various equitable remedies some of which include specific performance, injunction, and restitution.
However, in this case, INJUNCTION would be preferable, as it will prevent or restrain Calvin from playing baseball for a another team.
Injunction is an order restraining a person to begun or continue doing the action that which he should not do. Thus, injunction will stop Calvin from playig baseball for another team because he signed a multiyear contract with a professional basketball team and therefore he cannot opt out and play for another team.
Hence, in this case, the right answer is EQUITY REMEDY: INJUNCTION
The remedy that the team could seek in this scenario is Equitable remedy.
The Equitable remedy is a remedy in law which is applicable where there is a breach of contract and seeks to provide damages to the non-breaching party.
Here, it is very obvious that Calvin has breach the term of the contract, thus, subjective to be sued for damages by his team.
Therefore, the Equitable remedy is the remedy that the team can seek for this scenario.
Learn more about this here
brainly.com/question/5063656
