Which statement justifies that ∠K ≅ ∠N? answers: A) ΔHKL ≅ ΔHMN by ASA; but the two angles aren't congruent because they aren't corresponding angles. B) The two angles aren't congruent. C) ΔHKL ≅ ΔHMN by ASA; ∠K ≅ ∠N because they're corresponding angles in congruent triangles. D) ΔHLK ≅ ΔHMN by AAS; ∠K ≅ ∠N because they're corresponding angles in congruent triangles.

Which statement justifies that K N answers A ΔHKL ΔHMN by ASA but the two angles arent congruent because they arent corresponding angles B The two angles arent class=

Respuesta :

Answer:

Correct answer is:

D) ΔHLK ≅ ΔHMN by AAS; ∠K ≅ ∠N because they're corresponding angles in congruent triangles.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the diagram, in which there are 2 triangles namely [tex]\triangle HLK, \triangle HMN[/tex].

1. Side KH = Side NH

2. [tex]\angle L \cong \angle M[/tex]

From the given figure, we can derive that:

[tex]\angle KHL \cong \angle NHM[/tex]

Property used: Vertically opposite angels made by two lines crossing each other are equal.

So, we have two angles ([tex]\angle L \cong \angle M[/tex] and [tex]\angle KHL \cong \angle NHM[/tex])of the triangle as same and one side equal from the two given triangles [tex]\triangle HLK, \triangle HMN[/tex].

So, we can say that the two triangles are congruent.

[tex]\triangle HLK \cong \triangle HMN[/tex]

The side is not between the two equal angles, so it is AAS congruence.

And Congruent triangles have their corresponding angles equal.

Therefore, option D) is true :

ΔHLK ≅ ΔHMN by AAS; ∠K ≅ ∠N, because they're corresponding angles in congruent triangles.

Answer:

ΔHLK ≅ ΔHMN by AAS; ∠K ≅ ∠N because they're corresponding angles in congruent triangles.

Step-by-step explanation: I took the test