Considering the historian's use of source material, which interpretation is
most valid?
O A. A historian uses an unidentified political cartoon in order to draw
conclusions about resistance to the Rwandan genocide,
B. A historian cites an autobiography written by a Rwandan farmer in
order to draw conclusions about the effects the genocide had on
citizens
C. A historian uses articles published in an Italian newspaper in order
to draw conclusions about the effect of the Rwandan genocide on
the general population,
D. A historian cites an academic journal article about the history of
genocide in order to draw conclusions about how Rwandans can
best rebuild their country,

Respuesta :

Answer:

b) a historian cites an autobiography written by a rwandan farmer in order to draw conclusions about the effects the genocide had on citizens

Explanation:

The interpretation that is most valid considering the historian's use of source material B. A historian cites an autobiography written by a Rwandan farmer in order to draw conclusions about the effects the genocide had on citizens.

What is the usefulness of source material to the historian?

The source material usually serves as the one that help the historian to be able to get more information about a particular topic.

For , instance,  A historian cites an autobiography written by a Rwandan farmer ,to be able to draw their conclusion about genocide.

Read more about historian's at:

https://brainly.com/question/25920220

#SPJ6