Dr. Original conducts a study, finds significant results, and gets an article published. Dr. Copycat conducts the same study in her own lab using the same methodology and a matching sample of new participants. How would the field of psychology view Dr. Copycat’s research?

The field of psychology would see Dr. Copycat's research as a replica of Dr. Original's original research. In that case, Dr. Copycat's experiment would be considered honest if, during publication, credits were provided for Dr. Original's research.

Explanation:

It is acceptable for scientific research to be replicated by different researchers. However, the publication of a scientific research classified as a replica must contain credits to the original research, otherwise it will be considered plagiarism.

In this case, in relation to the example shown in the question above, we can say that the field of psychology would see Dr. Copycat's research as a replica of the original research, carried out by Dr. Original. In that case, Dr. Copycat's experiment would be considered honest if, during publication, credits were provided for Dr. Original's research.

PiaDeveau PiaDeveau · Answer 2 · 2022-01-11T12:28:39+01:00

Dr. Copycat's study would be considered a copy of Dr. Original's initial research in the field of psychology.

In such instance, Dr. Copycat's investigation would be regarded honest if acknowledgment for Dr. Original's findings was given upon publishing.
In this situation, we may argue that, in connection to the example given in the question, the area of psychology would see Dr. Copycat's study as a duplicate of Dr. Original's actual research.

Learn more:

https://brainly.com/question/17925992?referrer=searchResults