Respuesta :
Answer:
The answer is C. By showing that the high school and elementary school bus schedules could be swapped with little trouble
Explanation:
This is basically process of elimination. Option A makes the author sound like she's agreeing with the opposing argument. Option B does not talk about anything related to bus schedules and Option D is only talking about the students that attend high school and elementary school not talking about how the situation can be fixed.
The greatest way the author addresses a counterargument is by demonstrating how easily the bus schedules for the primary and high schools may be switched. So, option (C) is the correct answer.
What is the best opposing argument as per the bus schedules?
The author of the given passage argues that high school should start later.
They also offer evidence in support of this assertion, stating that 70% of high school students who are tardy arrive before the conclusion of the first period and that majority of them do so because they slept in.
They merely arrive late to class because it starts too early for them, and if it started later, they would likely perform better. Although not mentioned directly, it is implied.
And in essence, this is an elimination procedure.
The author seems as though she is endorsing the opposing position in Option A.
Option D just discusses the students who attend high school and elementary school without discussing how the situation can be remedied, while Option B only discusses the students who attend high school and elementary school.
As a result, option (C) is the best claim about the bus schedules.
Check out the link below to learn more about bus schedule debate;
https://brainly.com/question/19466255
#SPJ2