Which statement offers the best argument AGAINST Theodore Roosevelt's "Big Stick" diplomacy?
es )
A)
Roosevelt used America's military power in an unjust manner in his pursuit
of our foreign policy goals.
B)
Roosevelt's use of military threats angered Great Britain, France, and
Germany and helped cause World War I.
Roosevelt was successful in bringing much of Latin America under direct
American control, including Cuba and the Panama Canal.
D
"Big Stick" diplomacy had few strengths and its main effect was actually an
increase in revolution and conflict in the Western Hemisphere.

Roosevelt's usefulness of military threats angered Great Britain, France, and Germany and supported the cause of World War I. The correct option is 'B'.

Who is Roosevelt?

In the months conducting up to World War I, the United States desired to preserve its neutrality because president Wilson was a Quaker and was against fighting of any kind.

When the armed strengths were preoccupied with issues on the Mexican border.

Although, the U.S. had the most powerful navy in the world and it was needed to keep the coastline secure.

After that, the U.S. was exchanging heavily with European nations and accomplished not want its business interrupted.

Therefore, Roosevelt's "Big Stick" prudence suggests the best argument AGAINST Theodore Roosevelt's usefulness of military threats angered Great Britain, France, and Germany and supported the cause of World War I. The correct option is 'B'.

Find more information about Roosevelt here:

https://brainly.com/question/3382852