avacrowell03
contestada

Read the excerpt from the Supreme Court’s Miranda v. Arizona decision.

Prior to any questioning, the person must be warned that he has a right to remain silent, that any statement he does make may be used as evidence against him, and that he has a right to the presence of an attorney, either retained [hired] or appointed.

—Miranda v. Arizona

The Warren Court was the US Supreme Court during Earl Warren’s service as chief justice from 1953 to 1969. Warren Court critics believed that decisions like Miranda v. Arizona were examples of

judicial activism.
states’ rights.
affirmative action.
constitutional overreach.

Respuesta :

Answer:

judicial activism

Explanation:

As per the Warren court critics it was believed that decision which were related to the Miranda V Arizona were example of Judicial activism option(a) is correct.

What is Warren Court critics?

Warren Court critics refers to the era actually when Earl warren was known to be as the chief justice of US from the period of 1953-1969 when he served as the chief justice of the US.

Warren court expanded the overall civil rights the judicial activism and the federal power in a such a dramatic way so he thought and believed tar Miranda v Arizona were example of the judicial activism.

Therefore Option(a) is correct as it was example of Miranda v Arizona.

Learn more about Warren Court here:

brainly.com/question/14270054

#SPJ2

Otras preguntas