contestada

Imagine you have been convicted of a crime but you believe that procedural due process was not followed. What could you do or argue?
​

Respuesta :

Jahsehliveonforever

Answer:the principle it enunciated has required state officials to controvert allegations that knowingly false testimony had been used to convict and has upset convictions found to have been so procured.

Explanation

i dont know if this is a multi choice but you could do this

Otras preguntas