contestada

In 2014 President Barack Obama claimed that the United States should intervene in an attack on the Yazidi people in Iraq by ISIS in order to prevent genocide. An interventionist might argue that the United States was justified in such an attack, just as a bystander would be permitted to intervene if they were to see an innocent person being threatened.

Required:
What would be the best response that the non interventionist would give to the interventionist argument?

Respuesta :

DaClawww

Answer:

Laissez-faire Versus Government Intervention. Historically, the U.S. government policy toward business was summed up by the French term laissez-faire -- "leave it alone." The concept came from the economic theories of Adam Smith, the 18th-century Scot whose writings greatly influenced the growth of American capitalism.

Government Involvement vs. Laissez-faire Traditionally, the American government's approach to business has been summarized by the French word laissez-faire, which means "leave this one alone."

The idea was inspired by Adam Smith's economic ideas, a Scot who lived in the 18th century and whose writings had a significant impact on the development of American capitalism.

Learn more:

https://brainly.com/question/25855656?referrer=searchResults

Otras preguntas