The available options are:
A woman had not first asked the missionary to leave the property.
B The woman knew that the door was substantially certain to pinch the missionary's fingers.
C The woman acted in anger by slamming the door shut
D The missionary was not trespassing when he came to the woman's door.
Answer:
B. The woman knew that the door was substantially certain to pinch the missionary's fingers.
Explanation:
If the missionary prevails, it will be because the woman knew that the door substantially certain to pinch the missionary's fingers.
This is because the action of the woman which is considered as the battery would be seen as an intentional tort or action from her if it can be proven that the woman is sure that the door would pinch the missionary's fingers.
Therefore, such an action would be considered as requisite intent for the battery committed.