i dont know :(

How is an article written 50 years after an event different from an article written one year after the event?

A: It can reflect on the long-term impact of the event.

B: It can summarize the details of the event chronologically.

C: It can provide lots of specific details about the event.

D:It can show the immediate reactions of the people involved.

Respuesta :

A: It can reflect on the long-term impact of
the event.

because it would be able to include things that happened in the 50 years after the event had occurred.

Answer:

A

Explanation:

An article written a year after would only have information on the effects of the event a year later and nothing beyond that, but an article written decades later would probably have more info on the long term effects of the event. For example what happened on 9/11, a year after the collapse of the towers there probably weren't that many people who had chronic diseases from the dust inhaled at Ground Zero, but years later more and more people found out they had some sort f long term effect from inhaling that dust years ago. Hope this helps :)