Answer:
Madame Loisel’s actions were motivated by selfishness and pride, and her sudden act of responsibility does not make her behavior heroic. Taking responsibility for her actions was something that was expected of her, and whatever course of action she decided to take in order to pay off the necklace is irrelevant. She lost the necklace and it was her job to do something about it, and she is no hero for having done this.
Mathilde Loisel is responsible for her own suffering in "The Necklace" because her superficial, materialistic desires influenced her to borrow the diamond necklace in the first place. Mathilde was then dishonest with Madame Forestier and went into debt to replace the necklace without her friend knowing. If Mathilde was honest with Madame Forestier from the beginning, she would have discovered that the necklace was a cheap imitation and not have purchased an expensive authentic replica.
Explanation:
https://www.bartleby.com/essay/What-Is-Madame-Loisel-Essay-PJ7NR4N26#:~:text=Madame%20Loisel's%20actions%20were%20motivated,off%20the%20necklace%20is%20irrelevant.
https://www.enotes.com/homework-help/how-is-madame-loisel-responsible-for-her-own-725750
Hope this helps.
