Respuesta :
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
In 1939, towards the end of the Great Depression, John Steinbeck's The Grapes of Wrath was published. The story's main plot is about the Joads, a farming family driven off their land in California and in search of jobs. Steinbeck provides a variety of intercalary sections that depictthe broader image of migrant workers such as the Joads and the many difficulties they experienced. In writing this book, Steinbeck aims to raise awareness of the horrific circumstances faced by migrant workers on their journeys across the world in search of jobs away from their homes. In chapter 11, through somber diction and haunting parallelism,Steinbeck conveys the negative effects of corporation-controlled farmland
.Steinbeck uses both somber diction and diction synonymous with the "wildness" of theland in chapter 11. Second, Steinbeck draws a strong contrast between the life left by the farmerswhen they left the land and the soulless equipment that now occupies it. Much of the diction inthe first half of the chapter is negative, vacant, dead, or linked to non-human machines ormethods, corrugated, disks, chemistry, research. Steinbeck's diction changes to an emphasison the uncivilized, unregulated land resulting from the vacant home in the second half of thechapter. The house falls into disrepair, animals take over, and finally there is a large hole in theroof, a glaring spot on the floor. The ragged curtains [fluttering] in the broken windows are the only traces of civility here, without the farmers. Through Steinbeck's choice of words, we can see that with farmers living on it and enjoying it, the land isbetter off, rather than with businesses just operating with soulless machines.
His use of parallel syntax is one way Steinbeck demonstrates the detrimentalconsequences of the corporate farming industry. The use of parallelism by Steinbeck spreadsthroughout the entirety of chapter 11. He starts the chapter by saying that houses were leftempty on the property, and he reiterates that "the houses were vacant in the middle of thechapter before demonstrating that a vacant house falls apart easily . This repetition ofthe vacancy principle indicates a clear causeand-effect relationship between the absence offarmers from the field and the problems facing the land now. This enables him to express hismessage that in the Great Depression, the way farmers were handled had many negative effects,not just for the farming families who had to leave their homes, but also for the land and theagricultural industry as a whole.
In conclusion, throughout the intercalary chapters of The Grapes of Wrath, the rhetoricaldevices demonstrate the many difficulties and adverse effects of driving tenant farmers and theirfamilies from their land. Steinbeck conveys his message from pessimistic diction to parallelsyntax that what happened to Midwestern farmers during the Great Depression was notappropriate and should not happen again. Via expert storytelling and haunting imagery, he arguesthat no one in the United States should ever have to experience these forms of struggles again.
