Respuesta :
B. argumentation is a necessary part of scientific inquiry because the others don't make sense. it IS possible to set a dispute and scientific knowledge IS attainable so A and D are ruled out. It can be easy to resolve a scientific argument but sometimes like this one, it can take many years. That leaves B as the most logical answer. Hope that helps.
Answer:
The correct answer will be option-B.
Explanation:
A scientific investigation is based on the systematic procedure to understand and explain the scientific question related to the natural phenomenon.
A scientific question before considering it as an objective question with one real answer is considered a subjective question. This subjectivity leads to different opinions of the scientific people which leads to the arguments in the scientific method.
This argumentation is the necessary component of the scientific investigation as it provides various hypothesis related to the scientific questions which have to be proved. Out of this hypothesis, only one hypothesis explains the phenomenon in depth.
Therefore in the given question opinions related to the shape of the earth over time has shown that argumentation is a part of the scientific method.
Thus, option-B is the correct answer.