Option C would be the most cost effective.
Breaking his lease is not a viable option because he may still have to pay for the remaining months on his lease and legal action could be taken against him, which will cost him attorney fees. More so, his credit report could be negatively impacted. That strikes out options B and D
Option A is not a viable option because he has large down payment savings already to purchase a home in the suburb. Renting a house there for the first year may deplete his savings. Why should he pay a landlord for a year when he has enough savings to make a down payment for the purchase of his own property?
