Respuesta :
It can be helpful when:
- The intervention occurs with a humanitarian purpose, as in a country that just had a couple of its cities wasted by a natural disaster, like a tsunami or tornado.
- Or in a country which its population has been suffering from hunger for decades due to political crises or coups
It can be ineffective or even destructive when:
- It's a military extreme intervention on a city or country that although on war, it's still very populated by civilians. Like it was in the War on Terror campaign, started by the US after the 9/11 terrorist assault, with American invasion on Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, and others. It ended up being effective, with even the fall of Al-Qaeda's terrorist organization leader in 2011, but in the process several cases of violent acts against and deaths of civilians were reported.
Answer:
There were many things that got success and there are some thing that did not get success.
The Successful things are US intervention is successful when humanitarian efforts are the focus or when the countries people have requested aid. This is true of places like the Balkans where the health of the people was the focus and refugee assistance was also available/possible. US intervention was not successful when they enter a conflict with a political or economic focus. The people of the area are often against our presence and are not accepting of US help. This is especially true in the case of civil war such as Vietnam.
Not successful--US intervention is not successful when they enter a conflict with a political or economic focus. The people of the area are often fighting against our presence and are not accepting of US help. This is especially true in the case of civil war such as Vietnam.
Explanation: