1)why did the framers insist that federal judges be appointed for a lifetime of service?
A)they wanted as little change as possible in the judicial branch
B)they wanted to control the nominees of the president
C)they wanted to avoid a continual appointment process
D)they wanted judges to make decisions based upon the law and not public opinion

2)which of the following represents the judicial philosophy of deciding cases based upon precedent and the original intent of the constitution ?
A)judicial activism
B)judicial power
C)judicial restraint
D)judicial review

3)which type of court would hear a case in which the U.S. Navy was used?
A)civilian court
B)federal court
C)military court
D)state court

4)concurrent jurisdiction allows for which court(s) to hear a case?
A)federal appellate
B)federal and state
C)federal only
D)state only

Question

24-10-2016
History

contestada

1)why did the framers insist that federal judges be appointed for a lifetime of service?
A)they wanted as little change as possible in the judicial branch
B)they wanted to control the nominees of the president
C)they wanted to avoid a continual appointment process
D)they wanted judges to make decisions based upon the law and not public opinion

2)which of the following represents the judicial philosophy of deciding cases based upon precedent and the original intent of the constitution ?
A)judicial activism
B)judicial power
C)judicial restraint
D)judicial review

3)which type of court would hear a case in which the U.S. Navy was used?
A)civilian court
B)federal court
C)military court
D)state court

4)concurrent jurisdiction allows for which court(s) to hear a case?
A)federal appellate
B)federal and state
C)federal only
D)state only

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

NEED HELP ASAP DUE TODAY PLZ HELP ME!!!! If you arranged the scale of our Solar System on a piece of 100-foot-long string, with the Sun at the beginning, how fa

what is the Social Contract Theory? What are at least two of your personal freedoms that you have given up to be a part of this social contract and what are two

Effects of stress on academic performance

Which real-world scenario can be described by the algebraic expression 4w? withdrawing w dollars from the bank and giving 4 dollars to a friend buying w items t

an ice cream shop has 3 ice cream flavors, 3 syrup flavors and three toppings. Flavors : Vanilla, chocolate, strawberry Syrup flavors : Hot fudge, caramel, butt

There are 3 Colonial Regions/Types of Colonies. true or false

Write a note on shakespeare's biography.

when you weight a lift what part of the arm is doing the most work

10. What is the rule of about acute angles if we have 2 parallel lines cut by a transversal?

Calculate the mass of calcium carbide produced if 1770 kJ of heat is absorbed.

Greenleafable Greenleafable · Answer 1 · 2017-10-17T21:56:42+02:00

The correct answer for 1 is
D)they wanted judges to make decisions based upon the law and not public opinion

If the judges were there until they retire then they could be more objective. That is because if they had to be reelected, they could just support what the people want so as to get reelected, which would mean that they are not objective and lawful judges.

The correct answer for 2 is
C)judicial restraint

This is done to prevent deciding on a case by case basis which might be highly controversial and often even oppressive towards people that are unwanted in the area of politics. This way criminals are treated according to older cases where older criminals were treated the same way.

The correct answer for 3 is
B)federal court

Federal courts are always the first step. Specific military courts with specific jurisdiction are used as appellate courts in this type of trials. If a person has problem with the Navy then it is solved by the federal courts that have jurisdiction over the case.

The correct answer for 4 is
B)federal and state

This is done to prevent court bias. Two or more courts can have jurisdiction over cases at the same time to prevent bias from sides towards one or another side or towards the state against the people involved. This was commonly used historically to protect people.